Decreasing readmissions after lung resection: The carrot or stick approach?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The Carrot or the Stick: Rewards, Punishments, and Cooperation
Many institutional arrangements suggest that punishments and rewards each play a separate role in providing incentives. In New York City’s recent negotiations with its teacher’s union, for instance, the city sought a contract that would strengthen school principals’ ability to assign teachers to be cafeteria monitors, in part because this allows them to punish underperforming teachers. The cont...
متن کاملLearning in Parkinsonism By Carrot or by Stick : Cognitive Reinforcement
www.sciencemag.org (this information is current as of October 8, 2009 ): The following resources related to this article are available online at http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5703/1940 version of this article at: including high-resolution figures, can be found in the online Updated information and services, http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/1102941/DC1 can be found at:...
متن کاملBy carrot or by stick: cognitive reinforcement learning in parkinsonism.
To what extent do we learn from the positive versus negative outcomes of our decisions? The neuromodulator dopamine plays a key role in these reinforcement learning processes. Patients with Parkinson's disease, who have depleted dopamine in the basal ganglia, are impaired in tasks that require learning from trial and error. Here, we show, using two cognitive procedural learning tasks, that Park...
متن کاملHunger: The carrot and the stick
Figure 1: Regulation of food intake by negative valence and positive valence appetitive systems, visceral aversive pathways, and the relationship with homeostatic deficit. Negative valence appetitive systems (e.g., AGRP neurons) are under homeostatic control, but AGRP neurons are rapidly inhibited by cues that predict food, thus consumption is associated with the positive valence system. Positi...
متن کاملA Carrot and Stick Approach to Agenda-Setting∗
This paper models a legislature in which the same agenda setter serves for two periods, showing how he can exploit a legislature (completely) in the first period by promising future benefits to legislators who support him. In equilibrium, a large majority of legislators vote for the firstperiod proposal because they thereby maintain the chance of belonging to the minimum winning coalition in th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
سال: 2015
ISSN: 0022-5223
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.06.037